+1443 776-2705 panelessays@gmail.com

 

Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the "Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics" template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics

Article Citation and Permalink

(APA format)

Article 1

Point

Description

Broad Topic Area/Title

Problem Statement

(What is the problem research is addressing?)

Purpose Statement

(What is the purpose of the study?)

Research Questions

(What questions does the research seek to answer?)

Define Hypothesis

(Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used)

Identify Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables

Population of Interest for Study

Sample

Sampling Method

Identify Data Collection

Identify how data were collected

Summarize Data Collection Approach

Discuss Data Analysis

Include what types of statistical tests were used for the variables.

Summarize Results of Study

Summary of Assumptions and Limitations

Identify the assumptions and limitations from the article.

Report other potential assumptions and limitations of your review not listed by the author.

Ethical Considerations

Evaluate the article and identify potential ethical considerations that may have occurred when sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, or publishing results. Summarize your findings below in 250-500 words. Provide rationale and support for your evaluation.

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

3

,

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-362V HLT-362V-O502 Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics 140.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) 4: Good (85.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Article (Quantitative, APA Citation and Permalink) 5.0% The article presented does not use quantitative research. N/A N/A N/A The article presented is based on quantitative research.
Article Citation and Permalink 5.0% Article citation and permalink are omitted. Article citation and permalink are presented. There are significant errors. Page numbers are not indicated to cite information, or the page numbers are incorrect. Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format, but there are errors. Page numbers to cite information are missing, or incorrect, in some areas. Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format. Page numbers are used in to cite information. There are minor errors. Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is accurately presented in APA format. Page numbers are accurate and used in all areas when citing information.
Broad Topic Area/Title 5.0% Broad topic area and title are omitted. Broad topic area and title are referenced but are incomplete. Broad topic area and title are summarized. There are inaccuracies. Broad topic area and title are presented. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Broad topic area and title are fully presented and accurate.
Problem Statement 5.0% Problem statement is omitted or incorrect. Problem statement is referenced but is incomplete. Problem statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies. Problem statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. Problem statement is accurate and clearly summarized.
Purpose Statement 5.0% Purpose statement is omitted or incorrect. Purpose statement is referenced but is incomplete. Purpose statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies. Purpose statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. Purpose statement is accurate and clearly summarized.
Research Questions 5.0% Research questions are omitted or incorrect. Research questions are partially presented. N/A N/A Research questions are presented and accurate.
Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used.) 5.0% Definition of hypothesis is omitted. The definition of the hypothesis is incorrect. Hypothesis is summarized. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Hypothesis is defined. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Hypothesis is accurate and clearly defined
Identify Variables and Type of Data for Variables 5.0% Variable type and data for variable are omitted. Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are inaccuracies. Variable type and data for variable are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Variable type and data for variable are presented and accurate.
Population of Interest for Study 5.0% Population of interest for the study is omitted. Population of interest for the study is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Population of interest for the study is presented. There are inaccuracies. Population of interest for the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Population of interest for the study is presented and accurate.
Sample 5.0% Sample is omitted. Sample is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Sample is presented. There are inaccuracies. Sample is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided. Sample is presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
Sampling Method 5.0% Sampling method is omitted. Sampling method is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Sampling method is presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted. Sampling method is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Sampling method is presented and accurate.
Identify Data Collection 5.0% How data were collected is not identified. How data were collected is presented but is incorrect. How data were collected is partially presented. There are inaccuracies or omissions. How data were collected is identified. There are minor inaccuracies How data were collected is fully identified and accurate.
Summary of Data Collection Approach 5.0% The means of data collection are omitted. The means of data collection are referenced. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. The means of data collection are presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted. The means of data collection are summarized. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided. The means of data collection are thoroughly summarized and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
Data Analysis 5.0% Data analysis is omitted. Data analysis is incomplete. Not all types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. The types of statistical tests listed are incorrect or unrelated to the variables indicated. Data analysis is summarized. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There are inaccuracies or omissions. Data analysis is generally discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There minor inaccuracies. Data analysis is discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are all indicated and accurate.
Summary Results of Study 5.0% Summary of the results of the study is omitted or incorrect. The results of the study are partially presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. More information is needed. The results of study are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. Some information or rationale is needed for support. The results of study are summarized. Minor detail or information is needed for accuracy or clarity. The results of study are well summarized. The summary is accurate and clearly represents the results of the study.
Summary Assumptions and Limitations 10.0% Identification of assumptions and limitations by the author is omitted. Summary of potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author is omitted or not relevant to the study. Some assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are partially presented. Significant information is needed. Most assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More information or rationale is needed for support. Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Some information or rationale is needed for support. Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Strong rationale is provided to support summary.
Summary of Ethical Considerations 10.0% Summary of ethical considerations is omitted. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are incomplete. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Significant information and rationale are needed to support summary. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are presented. There are some inaccuracies. Some information and rationale are needed to support summary. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Some rationale or evidence are needed to support summary. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are clearly summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Strong rationale and support are provided.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage 100%