+1443 776-2705 panelessays@gmail.com

 

For this assignment, consider the organization where you currently work or an organization where you may have worked in the past as a point of reference for evaluating the coaching model and team-based performance.

(Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of these assignments. In your original work, you may use aspects of existing processes from either your current or a former place of employment. However, you must remove any and all identifying information that would enable someone to discern the organization[s] that you have used.)

Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you:

  1. Classify the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching. Judge the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities.
  2. Recommend three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager-Coaches in the textbook. Justify each element as it relates to optimizing performance.
  3. Construct five (5) best practices that would maximize team-based performance in the selected organization. Specify the primary manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision.
  4. Use three (3) external sources to support your responses. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Develop a coaching model that optimizes performance management activities.
  • Debate the team-based performance management best practices.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in performance management.
  • Write clearly and concisely about performance management using proper writing mechanics.

Points: 250 Assignment 2: Coaching Model

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A 1. Classify the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching. Judge the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching. Did not submit or incompletely judged the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities.

Partially classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching. Partially judged the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities.

Satisfactorily classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching. Satisfactorily judged the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities.

Thoroughly classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching. Thoroughly judged the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities.

2. Recommend three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager-Coaches in the textbook. Justify each element as it relates to optimizing performance. Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager-Coaches in the textbook. Did not submit or incompletely justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance.

Partially recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager- Coaches in the textbook. Partially justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance.

Satisfactorily recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager- Coaches in the textbook. Satisfactorily justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance.

Thoroughly recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager- Coaches in the textbook. Thoroughly justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance.

3. Construct five (5) best practices that would maximize team-based performance in the selected organization. Specify the primary

Did not submit or incompletely constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team-based

Partially constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team- based

Satisfactorily constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team- based

Thoroughly constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team- based

manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision.

Weight: 25%

performance in the selected organization. Did not submit or incompletely specified the primary manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision.

performance in the selected organization. Partially specified the primary manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision.

performance in the selected organization. Satisfactorily specified the primary manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision.

performance in the selected organization. Thoroughly specified the primary manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision.

4. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

5. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

6. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.

7. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

8. Clarity and Coherence of Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.