+1443 776-2705 panelessays@gmail.com

 

Literacy Toolkit

Your principal recognizes your leadership role and that you have utilized data to inform instruction and has asked that you create a digital presentation to be used to advance professional practice in literacy. Prepare a professional development to highlight the literacy strategies, implemented throughout the field experiences, which can be used as a resource to be implemented collaboratively to present a shared vision, supportive culture, and common goals to teachers on a district-wide level in order to advocate for students. 

Create an 8-10 slide digital presentation to highlight how you implemented the IWY strategy during field experiences to introduce and reinforce language and literacy concepts. This strategy will be beneficial as a collaborative resource for teachers district-wide to analyze student data based on student performance in order to modify instruction and implement next steps for instruction. Be sure to include a title slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.

Your presentation should include a summary of each instructional strategy implemented in the field experiences, how it could be amended for future instruction, including the following:

  • How to evaluate language and literacy strategies and student performance when modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling readers.
  • Examples of how to manage and monitor the success of the interventions for at-risk and struggling readers.
  • The ethical way to communicate student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction.
  • How you will collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice.

Support your findings with two scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ELM-540 ELM-540-O501 Literacy Toolkit 100.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Summary of Strategies 20.0% Not addressed. Summary of strategies is poorly developed and lacking detail of future amendment. Digital presentation includes a surface level summary of strategies, with minimal future amendment. Digital presentation includes a detailed and relevant summary of each strategy, with credible future amendment. Digital presentation includes a thorough and comprehensive summary of each strategy, with in-depth future amendments.
Appropriate Interventions 15.0% Not addressed. The explanation as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance for modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students is not included or is inadequately addressed. A vague explanation is included with limited details as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance, modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students is provided. Relevant and credible examples as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance for modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students are provided. Thought-provoking and insightful examples as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance for modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students are thoroughly provided.
Manage and Monitor Success 15.0% Not addressed. Digital presentation includes examples that are unrelated and inappropriate in explaining how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. Digital presentation includes examples that are rudimentary and lacking detail of how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. Digital presentation includes relevant and credible examples of how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. Digital presentation includes insightful and thought-provoking examples of how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers.
Progress Data 10.0% Not addressed. Digital presentation includes an explanation that inadequately and poorly describes the ethical way to communicate student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction. Digital presentation includes a basic and rudimentary explanation of the ethical way to communication student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction. Digital presentation includes a detailed and relevant explanation of the ethical way to communication student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction. Digital presentation includes a substantial and in-depth explanation of the ethical way to communication student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction.
Collaboration with Professionals 10.0% Not addressed. Digital presentation inadequately and poorly describes how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice. Digital presentation includes a basic and rudimentary description of how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice. Digital presentation includes a detailed and adequate description of how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice. Digital presentation includes a thoughtful and insightful description of how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice.
Research Citations 15.0% Not addressed. Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Presentation 5.0% Not addressed. The work is sloppy or chaotic. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. The work is somewhat disheveled and includes several organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be desirable for public dissemination. The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination.
Total Weightage 100%