+1443 776-2705 panelessays@gmail.com

 See the attached file for requirements. 

OL 620 Module Two Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: For this task, you will write a reflection on a current issue in strategic human resources. To find your topic, use the University of Pennsylvania’s
[email protected] website. Type “human resources” into the site’s search feature to find articles about issues that can be directly impacted by a human
resources strategy (e.g., workforce training, company culture, etc.).

Prompt: Once you have read the article of your choice, write a reflective analysis in relation to an organization you work for or used to work for. Refer to the
article How to Broaden Your Critical Thinking Skills and use critical thinking in your response to the following three questions:

 What area of human resource strategy is discussed in the article you chose, and how did the strategy address a human resource issue? Provide
supporting details.

 How would you compare the human resource strategy in the article to the human resource strategy in your organization? Provide supporting details.

 If you were the human resource leader, what would you have done the same, and what would you have done differently? Explain your answers with a
supporting rationale based on the course and curriculum content you’ve learned this far.

Rubric

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document (in addition to a cover page and references). Use double
spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Along with the original article, reference at least one other source. Cite all sources in APA style.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Human Resource
Strategy

Meets “Proficient” criteria
and details provided
demonstrate a complex grasp
of the issue

Indicates the area of HR
strategy discussed and how
the strategy addressed the
issue, providing supportive
details in the explanation

Indicates the area of HR
strategy discussed and how
the strategy addressed the
issue, but explanation is
illogical or lacks specific
details

Does not indicate the area
of HR strategy discussed or
how the strategy addressed
issue

30

Comparison Meets “Proficient” criteria
and displays keen insight in
the comparison details

Compares the human
resource strategy in the
article to the human
resource strategy in another
organization and explanation
contains supportive details

Compares the human
resource strategy in the
article to the human
resource strategy in another
organization, but
explanation is illogical or
lacks specific details

Does not compare the
human resource strategy in
the article to the human
resource strategy in
another organization

30

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Human Resource
Leader

Meets “Proficient” criteria
and explanation shows a
nuanced understanding of
decision circumstances based
on the course and curriculum
content

Explains what one would do
the same or differently as an
HR leader and provides a
supporting rationale

Explains what one would do
the same or differently as an
HR leader, but response
doesn’t include a supporting
rationale or the supporting
rationale is illogical and not
based on course content

Does not explain what one
would do the same or
differently as an HR leader

30

Articulation of
Response

Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented
in a professional and easy-to-
read format

Submission has no major
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization

Submission has major errors
related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively
impact readability and
articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that
prevent understanding of
ideas

10

Total 100%